Your clients asked AI 170 times. PRK Livengood appeared 7 times.

Here is what your clients see right now

One real question, one real answer, from the audit generated 2026-09-19.

Your competitors already own these answers PRK Livengood share of voice: 21%

How often each brand appeared across all 170 tests.

Share of voice is PRK Livengood's portion of all brand mentions counted in this section, meaning you and the named competitors together. It is a share of mentions rather than a percentage of the 170 tests.

Every one of those mentions started as content someone published. The ones ahead of you published more of it, in more places.

The gap has been open for months

An independent index tracks how often AI assistants cite each brand over time. The lines below are PRK Livengood against Perkins Coie, from a source independent of the 170 live tests above.

The numbers above are who AI names right now. The trend below is why: the brands AI cites most across the web are the ones it recommends, and PRK Livengood has been on the wrong side of that citation gap for months.

Plotting the 2 rivals with the most citations, of 6 named in this report.

This independent index holds history for any domain it already tracks, so the trend is real from the first report. It confirms, from a source separate to the live tests, that the gap is persistent.

The 34 questions your clients actually ask

Grouped by buying stage. Each pill is one assistant answering one question.

• PRK Livengood present
• PRK Livengood not present
• No brand named

Each red pill is a question with no answer of yours in circulation. Publish one answer, and the assistants have something of yours to name.

Control check: when buyers ask about PRK Livengood by name

These 6 questions include your brand name, so AI naming you here is expected and none of them count in the numbers above. What matters is what the answers say, and if your site is the source.

How AI talks about PRK Livengood

Across the answers where PRK Livengood did get named, here is the tone AI assistants strike, and the specifics they raise.

What your content talks about vs what your clients ask

The fastest way to see why the answers above skip PRK Livengood.

Your site's content lines up with 14 of the 34 questions your clients ask AI.

The assistants can only cite what exists. Every question on the right with no matching content is an answer handed to a competitor.

Where the openings are

Every card below is a question set where the answer can change, ranked by how much buying intent sits behind it.

The plan below closes these in order of buying intent.

Sound familiar?

The pattern behind these numbers shows up the same way in almost every business audited.

Every month you wait, the names AI already knows get named more. If you never say it, AI cannot repeat it.

Why "AI SEO" audits change nothing

Most "AEO" and "AI SEO" agencies sell technical fixes that are rarely needed. Here is the common sense they skip.

The chart below shows the two ways brands publish, over 24 months. The grey line is mass-produced AI content pushed onto one site: it spikes when it first gets indexed, then the assistants filter it as spam and it collapses. The orange line is MultiCast content: fewer topics, 8 formats each, placed on trusted sites, where every placement keeps earning citations and the curve keeps climbing.

How to get every AI and search engine recommending PRK Livengood, and not your competitors

The method is called MultiCasting. You take one topic your clients ask about, turn it into 8 ready-to-publish formats, and post them across 300+ trusted sites and platforms the AI assistants already read. The assistants keep seeing PRK Livengood in the sources they trust, so they start naming it in answers.

Getting one topic published across news sites, video, audio and social used to take a team of specialists and weeks of work, so almost nobody did it. The MultiCasting method, invented by the team that fulfils this plan, produces all 8 formats and places them in one campaign. That is why the brands below hold answers your own site alone can never reach.

Why being in the answers matters

Buyers ask AI before they decide, across many platforms, not just Google. If AI never names you, you are not in the conversation.

Get published where the assistants already read

The same sites the assistants pull answers from when they decide who to name.

Apple News

SlideShare

Instagram

Facebook

Shopify

and 100s more sites the assistants read when they answer

Examples of MultiCasting results

Real campaigns running the same method behind the plan above, across different kinds of business. Each is one brand's search growth after publishing with MultiCasting.

Power tools wholesaleEcommerce

40,500 clicks and 3.72M impressions over 12 months, average position 7.4.

Automotive accessoriesEcommerce

26,200 clicks and 3.43M impressions, daily clicks climbing from near zero to a peak near 180 a day.

Pest controlLocal service

26,300 clicks and 4.1M impressions over 12 months, climbing from 60 clicks a day to a sustained 150 plus.

Moving companyLocal service

Daily impressions rising from about 40,000 to peaks near 120,000 over 12 months.

Addiction treatmentHealthcare

471,000 clicks and 58.1M impressions, average position 7.2.

Ad-intelligence softwareSaaS

188,000 clicks and 2.57M impressions, 7.3% average click-through.

Each chart is a real campaign, anonymised. Results vary with the business, the category and how many topics run.